Certified vs. Qualified
By Jeff Williamson & Paul Bird
Typically, a basic firearms course, like those used for Mississippi’s Enhanced Carry requirement, involves standing on a static firing line, engaging paper targets in perfect lighting, from a stable stance and with ample time to fire. By the end of the day participants receive a certificate proving they’ve completed the training. While that piece of paper demonstrates they’ve met certain minimum requirements, it does not necessarily mean they possess the skills, judgment, or mindset required to operate effectively in a real-world, high-stress situation. There is a critical distinction between being certified and being qualified.
Being certified simply means you have been exposed to certain concepts and techniques and have demonstrated them under ideal conditions. Being qualified means you can apply those skills dynamically, under pressure, in unpredictable environments, and with the added responsibility of protecting innocent lives.
Consider the environments which armed citizens may find themselves in. It is often crowded, with people moving in different directions, and a layout that may not be designed for tactical movement. An armed citizen must be able to make split-second decisions, accurately identify threats, and avoid endangering bystanders. This requires far more than just hitting a stationary target.
True qualification involves scenario-based training, stress inoculation, and an understanding of the legal, moral, and spiritual responsibilities that come with the role. It also includes proficiency in less-lethal options, de-escalation techniques, communication skills, and teamwork. A qualified armed citizen doesn’t just know how to use a firearm—they know when not to use it, and how to handle situations where lethal force isn’t appropriate.
The stakes are incredibly high. In a real-life incident, there is no second chance to make the right decision. Being merely certified might get someone onto a team, but being truly qualified is what ensures they can act decisively and responsibly when lives are on the line.
Armed citizens, and for example, churches should ensure their security teams go beyond the basics. Regular, ongoing training, simulated drills, and realistic force-on-force scenarios are essential. In the end, it’s not about a piece of paper hanging on a wall—it’s about developing the competence, confidence, and discernment necessary to protect a congregation without causing unintended harm.
